Is Noah Berlatsky canceled?
Twitter far-left warrior Noah Berlatsky has gained notoriety online for such blunt observations as “Why Ant-Man Should Be Black,” an article that Vice, to his embarrassment, published. This forced clickbait – in other words, Berlatsky’s usual tariff – in which the writer postulates that “the central power of the hero [is] whiteness ”, has earned the author many well-deserved derision, but the latest controversy in which he is embroiled goes far beyond mere embarrassment. In fact, she has the makings of an annulment because it has to do with her perceived defense of pedophiles.
Berlatsky is the communications director of an organization known as the Prostasia Foundation, which says its mission is to “prevent child sexual abuse before it happens, rather than simply hunting down and punishing those who have. already offended “. It sounds reasonable, so why are so many people convinced that Prostasia is a pro-pedophile group disguised as a children’s rights organization?
Let’s start with the fact that the organization does not use the word “pedophile”, preferring instead to use “minor attracted person” – MAP – a more neutral designation that has enraged many and appears to have little to do with the protection of children. It’s no surprise that the neologism was seen as a rebranding effort for pedophilia, given the pejorative impact of the word “pedophile,” which is defined as “a person sexually attracted to children.” Whenever a fledgling political movement is underway, the top of the to-do list is manipulating language. With the “awakened” movement, for example, the definition of “white supremacist” was broadened beyond its original meaning, and coined words like “whiteness” and “white fragility” appeared.
Prostasia has drawn criticism for promoting the MAP Support Club, which it calls “a safe, chat-based peer support network for minors attracted to those aged 13 and over.” Prostasia thinks it’s a good idea to support a place where younger teens can socialize with adult adults who are drawn to them, but I’m not convinced. The MAP Support Club promotes itself as a “support chat for people attracted to minors who are fundamentally against child sexual abuse,” but pedophiles’ eyes should light up when they hear about a place they are. can chat with 13-year-olds and then maybe find a way to make the chat private after spending enough time preparing them. Prostasia must have known that the approval of this meeting place was going to provoke outrage, but she did it anyway, in the name of “stopping child abuse”.
Prostasia has aligned himself with some advocating questionable agendas, including having clinical psychologist James Cantor on his team, who advocates for the inclusion of pedophiles in the LGBT coalition. In a 2019 interview for 60 Minutes Australia, Cantor referred to “righteous pedophiles”, referring to those who claim, without verification, not to act on their impulses.
For Prostasia, Berlatsky conducted a friendly interview with Mireille Miller-Young, professor of feminist studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who told him that for children being exposed to pornography can be joyful and fun. The interviewer offered no hindsight.
On the other hand, Berlatsky took a lot of abuse for his item in Atlantic which referred to “child sex workers”. The objection was based on the assumption that minors selling on the streets are trafficked, rather than sex workers. But they are not all victims of trafficking; some do it out of necessity, and Berlatsky has rightly pointed out that they shouldn’t be arrested and then have to face a criminal record at such a young age. In this case, Berlatsky’s criticisms were unwarranted.
Berlatsky’s employer Prostasia is campaigning for the legalization of sex dolls, claiming they can take the place of a child in the erotic imagination of a pedophile. If so, no matter how disgusting this product is on the surface, it could still come in handy. But there is no definitive research indicating that the “surrogate” theory is true. Critics say such dolls normalize sexual assault on children and undermine the societal barriers that deter them.
Berlatsky is the type to smear people with attacks he would be afraid to face. Full Disclosure: I’ve had a controversial online relationship with Berlatsky for years, both on Twitter and in the comments section of Splice Today, to which he regularly contributes. In short, we can’t stand each other. But being widely vilified seems to be something Berlatsky thrives on. And now he finds himself in a situation where this strange addiction will be put to the test.
People are now running away from Berlatsky. Even Arthur Chu, another Twitter “blue check” – and an equally nasty person – ditched him on Twitter, claiming he would never work with Berlatsky again. When you are a progressive and you have lost Arthur Chu, you are radioactive.
But despite my intense dislike of Berlatsky, I don’t go with the crowd on Twitter that suggests, because of his work for Prostasia, that he is a pedophile. But Liz Breunig, a former New York Times writer who now writes for Atlantic, is less circumspect. “Don’t let me see you within 500 feet of an elementary school,” she said tweeted, referring to his nemesis.
But I could understand why people wouldn’t want to have their young children around someone who chose to promote the agenda of a group that claims its mission to be the prevention of child abuse, but often seems over. interested in covering pedophiles. Parents cannot take any chances if there is a red flag. In addition, I do not want pedophiles to be welcomed into the Rainbow Coalition and thus receive the protections that this implies. Prostasia seems to believe the opposite.
Do I want to see Berlatsky, one of the smartest creations on social media, canceled? Not at this point, but I can’t help but reflect on how much of Twitter’s darker elements have been the product of people who share its reckless and vindictive temper. There’s nothing Berlatsky loves more than calling someone he doesn’t agree with a fascist, fanatic or racist, but now he’s accused of being something even worse : a pedophile. Once you are tainted with this word, it is difficult to get rid of it.
Although Berlatsky’s biography on LinkedIn indicates that he is a “quick learner,” as you see on the resumes of senior citizens due to their lack of professional experience, he does not appear to have learned any crucial life lessons. . One of them is that after devoting himself to undermining the reputations of many people who did not deserve his abuse, things might not turn out so well when he decides to work with a pedophile friendly group. Berlatsky is a schadenfreude magnet at this point.
Poetic justice can be harsh. Today, Berlatsky has the chance to experience what he has made others feel. I have no sympathy for him. Anyone who chooses to become a swamp creature takes the risk of being engulfed by the swamp if they walk through the wrong mud hole.